Share:

PULP MILL ROAD over CHATEAUGAY RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+44.90652, -74.08786
44°54'23" N, 74°05'16" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PULP MILL ROAD over CHATEAUGAY RIVER
Structure number:000000003337650
Location:1 MI SW OF CHATEAUGAY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Total length:128.0 ft. [39.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2011
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:307 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations (including piles) on dry land well above flood water elevations. [9]
Sufficiency rating:89.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,128,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2017GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good30789.9
August 2015GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good31189.9
November 2013GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good30389.9
October 2011GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good30089.9
March 2011PoorFairSeriousPoor27917.3
September 2009PoorFairSeriousPoor27217.4
October 2008PoorFairSeriousPoor27917.3
August 2007PoorSatisfactorySeriousPoor27921.4
July 2006PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor27935.9
August 2005PoorFairPoorPoor27934.9
September 2004PoorFairPoorPoor27934.9
October 2003PoorFairPoorPoor27934.9
October 2002PoorFairPoorPoor27934.7
August 2000PoorGoodSatisfactoryPoor27935.7
October 1998PoorPoorFairPoor27932.7
October 1996PoorPoorPoorPoor27932.5
August 1994PoorPoorPoorPoor25032.5
August 1992PoorPoorFairPoor25037.2
October 1990PoorPoorFairPoor25037.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.500500000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.6,5486,548000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.3,5003,500000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.3,0773,077000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.9494000
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach88000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.2424000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.256256000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.1,5261,526000