CR 448 BUCKEYE RD over SR-11

Map

Coordinates:
+40.71442, -80.69657
40°42'52" N, 80°41'48" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CR 448 BUCKEYE RD over SR-11
Structure number:	1500635
Location:	1.22 MI S OF T-900
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	67.6 ft. `[20.6 m]`
Total length:	232.0 ft. `[70.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	16.4 ft. `[5.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1969
Year reconstructed:	2012
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod `[6]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) `[2]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	182 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Excellent `[9 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Excellent `[9 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	85.5
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$457,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2018	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Very Good	182	85.5
February 2017	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Very Good	1900	79.0
April 2016	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	277	81.0
April 2015	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	1900	79.0
March 2014	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	1900	79.0
July 2012	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	1900	79.0
August 2011	Poor	Poor	Good	Fair	1900	60.0
July 2010	Poor	Poor	Good	Fair	1900	60.0
August 2009	Poor	Poor	Good	Fair	1900	59.9
July 2008	Poor	Poor	Good	Fair	1900	59.9
August 2007	Poor	Poor	Good	Fair	1900	59.9
September 2006	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	1900	72.9
September 2005	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	1900	72.9
August 2004	Fair	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	1900	72.9
August 2003	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1900	72.9
August 2002	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1900	72.9
August 2000	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1900	70.9
October 1999	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Good	1900	74.9
October 1998	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1900	74.9
November 1997	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1900	74.9
August 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1900	74.9
September 1995	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1900	74.9
August 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1900	75.9
August 1993	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1900	74.9
August 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	1900	72.5
August 1991	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	1900	71.5