US 30 EB over RR;RIVER RD;OHIO R.
Map
Coordinates:
+40.62097, -80.5662340°37'15" N, 80°33'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 30 EB over RR;RIVER RD;OHIO R. |
Structure number: | 1502387 |
Location: | 1.61 MI E OF SR 7 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 227.7 ft. [69.4 m] |
Total length: | 783.5 ft. [238.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 59.1 ft. [18.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,836 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 56.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
Estimated cost of work: | $957,900,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 9836 | 56.0 |
May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 9836 | 54.0 |
March 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3239 | 89.5 |
May 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 82.5 |
May 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 81.4 |
October 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 81.4 |
December 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 79.4 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 79.4 |
August 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7350 | 79.4 |
November 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9068 | 79.0 |
July 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9068 | 79.0 |
July 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9068 | 79.0 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9343 | 79.0 |
September 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9343 | 79.0 |
December 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9343 | 79.0 |
November 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 80.4 |
August 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 80.4 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 82.4 |
October 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 82.4 |
November 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7301 | 81.5 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7301 | 81.5 |
August 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 7301 | 81.6 |
August 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 7301 | 81.6 |
August 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6270 | 83.4 |
August 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6270 | 83.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 2,934 | 2,654 | 280 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 601,891 | 439,382 | 120,378 | 30,094 | 12,037 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 25,618 | 23,637 | 1,887 | 94 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 23,111 | 20,406 | 1,200 | 1,500 | 5 |
Superstructure |
Steel Pin or Pin & Hangar Assembly | each | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 232 | 232 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Assembly without Seal Joint | linear ft. | 46 | 42 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Bearings |
Pot Bearing | each | 32 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,567 | 589 | 978 | 0 | 0 |