Share:

CR 33 F TAYLOR RD over SUGAR RUN

Map

Coordinates:
+40.15895, -83.25418
40°09'32" N, 83°15'15" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 33 F TAYLOR RD over SUGAR RUN
Structure number:8030669
Location:0.5 MI W. of INDUSTRIAL P
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1974
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,084 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:74.7

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2018GoodGoodVery GoodGood108474.7
August 2017GoodGoodVery GoodGood108474.7
August 2016GoodGoodVery GoodGood108474.7
December 2015GoodGoodVery GoodGood111274.7
March 2015GoodGoodVery GoodGood111290.3
February 2014GoodGoodVery GoodGood111274.7
January 2013GoodGoodVery GoodGood111274.7
November 2011GoodGoodVery GoodGood111274.7
May 2010GoodGoodVery GoodGood10080.4
February 2009GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
February 2006GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
March 2005GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
January 2004GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
January 2003GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
January 2002GoodGoodVery GoodGood10088.5
November 1999GoodGoodVery GoodGood10089.5
August 1997GoodGoodVery GoodGood10089.5
July 1996GoodGoodVery GoodGood10089.5
August 1995GoodGoodVery GoodGood10089.5
September 1994GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good10089.5
October 1993GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good10089.5
December 1992GoodGoodGoodGood10089.5
December 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood10089.5