19TH ST. over SALT CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+36.10155, -96.7197936°06'06" N, 96°43'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 19TH ST. over SALT CREEK |
Structure number: | 011220000000000 |
Location: | 19TH STHARMONY RD .6E |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Total length: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1920 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2014
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 23.1 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $238,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2014 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 100 | 23.1 |
March 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 100 | 23.1 |
March 2011 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 100 | 21.1 |
February 2009 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 100 | 21.1 |
October 2007 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 100 | 21.1 |
June 2005 | Poor | Serious | Critical | Poor | 100 | 21.1 |
May 2004 | Poor | Serious | Critical | Fair | 100 | 21.1 |
February 2003 | Poor | Serious | Critical | Satisfactory | 100 | 21.1 |
March 2002 | Poor | Serious | Critical | Satisfactory | 100 | 21.1 |
January 2001 | Poor | Serious | Critical | Satisfactory | 100 | 21.1 |
December 1999 | Poor | Critical | Critical | Fair | 100 | 21.1 |
January 1999 | Poor | Serious | Imminent Failure | Satisfactory | 100 | 20.0 |
January 1997 | Poor | Critical | Imminent Failure | Fair | 100 | 20.0 |
January 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 100 | 19.5 |
December 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 100 | 19.3 |
January 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 100 | 19.3 |
December 1991 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 44.7 |