E0870 over CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.75459, -95.6111835°45'17" N, 95°36'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | E0870 over CREEK |
Structure number: | 023530000000000 |
Old structure number: | 51E0870N4150007 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1N; 1.7E OF SH 16 & 72 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 96.1 ft. [29.3 m] |
Total length: | 199.2 ft. [60.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 22.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $700,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | - | - | - | - | 300 | 22.9 |
August 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 300 | 22.9 |
October 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 300 | 22.9 |
November 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 300 | 22.9 |
December 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 22.9 |
October 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 22.9 |
June 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
May 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
May 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
July 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
July 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
July 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
August 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
August 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
June 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 300 | 21.8 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 300 | 45.0 |
June 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 300 | 44.5 |
July 1994 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Serious | 300 | 27.1 |
June 1993 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Serious | 300 | 27.1 |
July 1991 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Serious | 300 | 27.1 |