+36.39510, -95.81059
36°23'42" N, 95°48'38" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:OLD U.S. 169 over CANEY RIVER
Structure number:032380000000000
Location:OLD US 169 2.2 MI N SH 20
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Total length:545.0 ft. [166.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:400 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:18.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,336,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2017PoorPoorSeriousFair40018.6
January 2015PoorFairSeriousSatisfactory40020.7
January 2013PoorFairSeriousSatisfactory40020.7
November 2009FairFairFairSatisfactory40046.4
August 2008FairFairFairFair40046.4
June 2007FairFairFairFair40046.4
May 2006FairFairFairFair40046.2
May 2005FairFairFairFair40046.2
September 2004FairFairFairFair40046.2
October 2003PoorSeriousFairSatisfactory40047.2
August 2002FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory40047.2
September 2001FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory40047.2
April 1999FairFairSatisfactoryFair40040.9
May 1997FairFairSatisfactoryFair685024.6
September 1996FairFairSatisfactoryFair685024.6
May 1995FairFairSatisfactoryFair630031.7
December 1994PoorPoorPoorFair630014.7
October 1993PoorPoorPoorFair630014.7
August 1992PoorPoorPoorFair740014.7