LAKEVIEW RD(E0600) over STILLWATER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.14481, -97.3192336°08'41" N, 97°19'09" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LAKEVIEW RD(E0600) over STILLWATER CREEK |
Structure number: | 122050000000000 |
Location: | 2N & 2.1W OF SH86/51JCT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Total length: | 58.1 ft. [17.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 35.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $299,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | 40 | 35.0 |
July 2016 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Serious | 40 | 37.0 |
July 2015 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 40 | 37.0 |
July 2014 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 40 | 37.0 |
July 2013 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 40 | 37.0 |
August 2012 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 35.0 |
July 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 35.0 |
October 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 35.0 |
December 2009 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 34.0 |
October 2007 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 34.0 |
February 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 40 | 34.0 |
November 2004 | Poor | Critical | Critical | Poor | 40 | 32.0 |
February 2003 | Poor | Critical | Critical | Poor | 40 | 32.0 |
March 2002 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 40 | 34.0 |
January 2001 | Poor | Critical | Critical | Poor | 40 | 32.0 |
December 1998 | Poor | Critical | Serious | Fair | 40 | 32.0 |
July 1997 | Poor | Imminent Failure | Imminent Failure | Fair | 40 | 32.0 |
October 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 73.7 |
November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 71.7 |
November 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 71.7 |