U.S. 270 over CASTON CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.96108, -94.7238334°57'40" N, 94°43'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | U.S. 270 over CASTON CREEK |
Structure number: | 126410000000000 |
Old structure number: | 4011 0084 X (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | .9 MI S JCT US271 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Total length: | 286.1 ft. [87.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1951 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,800 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 16% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 45.1 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,408,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 45.1 |
August 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 45.1 |
June 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 45.1 |
June 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 46.0 |
June 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1800 | 46.0 |
May 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 57.0 |
February 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1600 | 57.2 |
November 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1600 | 57.2 |
February 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 2400 | 30.5 |
August 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 2300 | 21.7 |
September 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 2300 | 21.7 |
October 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 2130 | 22.6 |
April 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 2130 | 22.6 |
March 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 6880 | 19.1 |
October 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 2170 | 17.1 |
September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 53.2 |
April 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 53.2 |
April 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1500 | 49.8 |