E1670 over COAL CREEK


+34.59310, -96.10674
34°35'35" N, 96°06'24" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:E1670 over COAL CREEK
Structure number:226870000000000
Location:.2 N & 1.5 E OF CAIRO
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:72.8 ft. [22.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$426,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2018GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good10097.8
July 2016GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good10097.8
July 2014GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good10097.8
July 2012GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10097.8
September 2010GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10097.8
August 2008GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10094.9
August 2006GoodGoodVery GoodGood10095.0
July 2004GoodGoodVery GoodGood10095.0
July 2002GoodGoodVery GoodGood10095.0
August 2000GoodGoodVery GoodGood10095.0
April 1998GoodGoodVery GoodGood10095.0
April 1996GoodGoodExcellentGood10095.0
April 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5095.0
April 1992GoodGoodGoodGood10092.0