SCAPPOOSE-VERNONIA over CROWN Z ROAD
Map
Coordinates:
+45.83222, -123.0465445°49'56" N, 123°02'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SCAPPOOSE-VERNONIA over CROWN Z ROAD |
Structure number: | 09C18 306900835 |
Location: | 047 M W SPITZENBURG |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 496 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 58.6 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $384,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 496 | 58.6 |
May 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 496 | 58.6 |
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 496 | 86.3 |
May 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 496 | 86.3 |
May 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 496 | 86.3 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 496 | 86.3 |
November 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 496 | 86.2 |
September 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 477 | 86.3 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 477 | 86.3 |
September 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 464 | 86.3 |
September 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 86.3 |
August 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 86.3 |
May 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 86.3 |
April 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 85.8 |
March 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 450 | 85.8 |
January 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 400 | 85.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Prestressed Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,175 | 1,800 | 75 | 300 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,175 | 0 | 2,105 | 70 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 66 | 61 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 18 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 58 | 43 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Joints |
Other Joint | linear ft. | 116 | 0 | 116 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 150 | 74 | 75 | 0 | 1 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 930 | 425 | 465 | 0 | 40 |