Share: 
T 512,KOLAK ROAD over CLEARFIELD CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.62290, -78.50330
40°37'22" N, 78°30'12" W
+40.62290, -78.50330
40°37'22" N, 78°30'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | T 512,KOLAK ROAD over CLEARFIELD CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000046339 |
| Old structure number: | 117207051230110 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | VILLAGE OF DEAN |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
| Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2010 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 130 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 130 | 88.9 |
| December 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 130 | 88.9 |
| December 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 130 | 88.9 |
| December 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 130 | 88.9 |
| December 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 130 | 88.9 |
| November 2009 | Poor | Fair | Imminent Failure | Fair | 100 | 22.5 |
| November 2008 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 22.5 |
| November 2007 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 22.5 |
| December 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Fair | 100 | 23.6 |
| December 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 100 | 25.6 |
| December 2004 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 100 | 25.6 |
| January 2004 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 100 | 25.6 |
| February 2003 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 500 | 21.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1460029
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1460029