Share:

SR 2034,SPRING ST. over OVER SR 6,FR.CK.HWY.& RR

Map

Coordinates:
+41.64677, -80.15606
41°38'48" N, 80°09'22" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 2034,SPRING ST. over OVER SR 6,FR.CK.HWY.& RR
Structure number:000000000013279
Old structure number:202034011004120 (from 1992 edition)
Location:CITY OF MEADVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:97.1 ft. [29.6 m]
Total length:943.9 ft. [287.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,053 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:50.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$233,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2018FairFairFairFair505350.0
July 2016FairFairFairFair445847.7
July 2014FairFairFairFair453347.4
July 2012FairFairFairFair462847.7
July 2010FairFairFairFair496147.1
July 2008FairFairFairFair496147.1
July 2006FairFairFairFair572549.1
July 2004FairFairFairFair560148.9
July 2002FairFairFairFair555749.0
September 2000FairFairFairFair959543.8
October 1998FairFairFairFair940744.1
August 1996FairFairFairFair992343.4
September 1994FairFairFairFair951044.1
March 1992PoorFairFairPoor921324.0
March 1990PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor881326.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.6,6111185,6578360
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.64,51864,518000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.33,06731,0811,98600
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.24,58124,581000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach22111100
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.2201862950
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.8475900
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.4073502550
Bearings
Movable Bearingeach84572700
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.96,77896,778000
Fixed Bearingeach2828000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.43,01343,013000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.1,8911,891000