BURNT MILL ROAD over CONODOGUINET CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.10440, -77.5606040°06'16" N, 77°33'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BURNT MILL ROAD over CONODOGUINET CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000017679 |
Old structure number: | 287207064230660 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2.3 MI SE OF SR 641 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
Total length: | 108.9 ft. [33.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1885 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 250 [as of 2009] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 16.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $153,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 16.5 |
December 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 16.5 |
December 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 16.5 |
December 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 16.5 |
December 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 250 | 16.5 |
January 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 100 | 16.8 |
December 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 100 | 16.8 |
November 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 18.4 |
January 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 16.6 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 100 | 16.1 |
December 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 28.6 |
November 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 28.4 |
October 1993 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 28.4 |
November 1991 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 28.4 |