BRIDGE 2606,T-401 over OVER NESHANNOCK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.18940, -80.2285041°11'22" N, 80°13'43" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BRIDGE 2606,T-401 over OVER NESHANNOCK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000026096 |
Old structure number: | 437204040126060 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | OLD MERCER RD E.LACK TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 102.0 ft. [31.1 m] |
Total length: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.7 ft. [5.7 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1922 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 271 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 32.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,276,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 271 | 32.8 |
September 2016 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 298 | 32.7 |
September 2014 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 351 | 32.6 |
September 2012 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 325 | 30.6 |
September 2010 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 456 | 48.0 |
September 2009 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 423 | 48.0 |
September 2008 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 375 | 48.1 |
December 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 423 | 80.2 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 426 | 80.2 |
October 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 423 | 80.0 |
October 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 423 | 77.9 |
October 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 244 | 80.0 |
October 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 310 | 78.0 |
October 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 310 | 80.0 |
October 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 310 | 68.7 |
August 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 394 | 79.9 |
July 1997 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 394 | 79.9 |
June 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 345 | 79.9 |
June 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 345 | 74.9 |
May 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 345 | 74.9 |
May 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 278 | 75.0 |
June 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 278 | 70.0 |
June 1991 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Good | 292 | 63.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 714 | 0 | 714 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,080 | 2,080 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Steel Truss | linear ft. | 204 | 0 | 200 | 4 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 95 | 0 | 80 | 15 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 105 | 0 | 90 | 15 | 0 |
Joints |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 208 | 208 | 0 | 0 | 0 |