HENRY COVERED BRDG over MINGO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.20250, -80.0166040°12'09" N, 80°00'60" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HENRY COVERED BRDG over MINGO CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000035319 |
Old structure number: | 627221082240050 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | MINGO CREEK COUNTY PARK |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1881 |
Year reconstructed: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 1993] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $27,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 64.9 |
June 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 63.9 |
June 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 63.9 |
June 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 56.6 |
June 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 300 | 56.6 |
June 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 67.7 |
June 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 67.4 |
September 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 67.4 |
September 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Serious | 300 | 27.2 |
September 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Serious | 300 | 27.2 |
July 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 300 | 74.9 |
September 1995 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 300 | 47.8 |
October 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 300 | 52.6 |
August 1991 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 300 | 52.6 |