MAPLE VALLEY RD over FLAT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.71448, -71.6522841°42'52" N, 71°39'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MAPLE VALLEY RD over FLAT RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000008430 |
Location: | 0.3 Mi N of JCT RI 117 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 17.4 ft. [5.3 m] |
Total length: | 35.8 ft. [10.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1978 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,353 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $86,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1353 | 50.6 |
April 2016 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1353 | 50.6 |
April 2014 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1300 | 50.6 |
April 2012 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1300 | 50.6 |
April 2010 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1300 | 50.6 |
May 2008 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1300 | 53.6 |
May 2006 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1314 | 53.6 |
December 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1314 | 69.7 |
January 2002 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1314 | 69.7 |
December 1999 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1100 | 69.8 |
September 1997 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1100 | 53.7 |
November 1995 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1200 | 53.8 |
October 1993 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1200 | 80.9 |
September 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 900 | 81.0 |
December 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 900 | 81.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Steel Culvert | linear ft. | 81 | 0 | 23 | 53 | 5 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 690 | 670 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,748 | 2,448 | 0 | 200 | 100 |