Share: 
LEWTON RD over SLICK CK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.66300, -104.03916
45°39'47" N, 104°02'21" W
+45.66300, -104.03916
45°39'47" N, 104°02'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LEWTON RD over SLICK CK |
| Structure number: | 000000032010197 |
| Location: | 3.0W & 7.7N C.CROOK |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 10° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2012 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2016] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.2 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 70 | 87.2 |
| June 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 70 | 87.2 |
| June 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 70 | 87.2 |
| December 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 70 | 94.5 |
| June 2010 | Poor | N out of 10 | 65 | 45.6 |
| October 2008 | Poor | N out of 10 | 65 | 45.6 |
| October 2006 | Poor | N out of 10 | 65 | 45.6 |
| July 2004 | Poor | N out of 10 | 65 | 45.6 |
| May 2002 | Fair | N out of 10 | 65 | 61.9 |
| June 2000 | Fair | N out of 10 | 65 | 61.9 |
| June 1998 | Poor | N out of 10 | 65 | 45.6 |
| August 1996 | Good | N out of 10 | 65 | 71.8 |
| October 1994 | Good | N out of 10 | 65 | 83.0 |
| October 1992 | Good | N out of 10 | 65 | 74.8 |
| September 1990 | Good | N out of 10 | 65 | 74.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1492206
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1492206