Share: 
COUNTY RD over KATY CK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.27720, -103.81163
45°16'38" N, 103°48'42" W
+45.27720, -103.81163
45°16'38" N, 103°48'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY RD over KATY CK |
| Structure number: | 000000032122467 |
| Location: | 12.9 W 0.3 N REDIG |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1961 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 36 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.4 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $4,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| June 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| October 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| July 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| May 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| May 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| June 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| August 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 36 | 89.4 |
| November 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 36 | 89.2 |
| October 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 36 | 89.2 |
| September 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 36 | 89.2 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1492219
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1492219