OLD HWY 85 over BOXELDER CK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.64424, -103.4840745°38'39" N, 103°29'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD HWY 85 over BOXELDER CK |
Structure number: | 000000032280212 |
Location: | 3.0E & 4.3N BUFFALO |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.6 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $15,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 64.6 |
June 2016 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 64.6 |
June 2014 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 64.6 |
June 2012 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 76.9 |
June 2010 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 76.9 |
October 2008 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 60 | 76.9 |
October 2006 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 87.9 |
July 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 89.9 |
May 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 89.9 |
May 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 89.9 |
June 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 90.9 |
August 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 60 | 90.8 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 60 | 90.9 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 60 | 90.2 |
July 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 60 | 90.2 |