220th Street over Lake Campbell
Map
Coordinates:
+44.19382, -96.8633444°11'38" N, 96°51'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 220th Street over Lake Campbell |
Structure number: | 000000051013001 |
Location: | Lake Campbell |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Total length: | 144.0 ft. [43.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.5 ft. [10.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Year reconstructed: | 2005 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 200 | 90.6 |
July 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 200 | 91.2 |
July 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 200 | 80.2 |
July 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 200 | 82.2 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 200 | 82.2 |
July 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 200 | 82.2 |
June 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 200 | 82.2 |
October 2005 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 200 | 82.2 |
August 2003 | Poor | Fair | Imminent Failure | Fair | 84 | 39.9 |
May 2002 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 84 | 39.9 |
June 2000 | Poor | Fair | Critical | Fair | 84 | 39.9 |
September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 84 | 40.0 |
August 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 84 | 60.9 |
May 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 84 | 60.6 |
August 1992 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 84 | 60.6 |
August 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 84 | 85.7 |