FAP 28 over WOLF RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+36.54230, -84.96187
36°32'32" N, 84°57'43" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	FAP 28 over WOLF RIVER
Structure number:	25SR0280003
Location:	IN PALL MALL-TENNESSEE
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) `[02]`
Length of largest span:	100.1 ft. `[30.5 m]`
Total length:	159.1 ft. `[48.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	24.9 ft. `[7.6 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1940
Historic significance:	Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places `[1]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	1,620 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	16% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	100.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,240,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Poor	Fair	Serious	Fair	1620	100.0
July 2016	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	1410	30.7
July 2014	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	1390	30.9
July 2012	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	1400	30.8
July 2010	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	1620	42.0
August 2008	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	1520	51.5
July 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1520	63.9
June 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1480	64.1
July 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1530	63.8
June 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1610	64.5
June 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1730	65.9
May 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1540	64.8
November 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1370	65.6
June 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1370	65.6
June 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	1530	43.1
July 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	1530	43.1

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	288	277	11	0	0
Steel Stringer	linear ft.	794	792	0	0	2
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	3,970	3,970	0	0	0
Superstructure
Steel Truss	linear ft.	318	258	40	20	0
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	155	149	0	6	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	65	40	25	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	60	54	6	0	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	25	25	0	0	0
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	25	25	0	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	12	0	0	12	0
Fixed Bearing	each	2	2	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	203	203	0	0	0
Other Material Bridge Rail	linear ft.	115	115	0	0	0