FAP 14 297767K over IC RR & NONCONNAH CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.07442, -90.05797
35°04'28" N, 90°03'29" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	FAP 14 297767K over IC RR & NONCONNAH CREEK
Structure number:	79SR0140006
Location:	0.3 MI S OF I55 JCT
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	141.7 ft. `[43.2 m]`
Total length:	787.4 ft. `[240.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	52.5 ft. `[16.0 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	13.5 ft. `[4.1 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1929
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	33,930 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. `[2]`
Sufficiency rating:	12.6
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$15,836,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
November 2018	Poor	Satisfactory	Fair	Serious	33930	12.6
December 2016	Poor	Satisfactory	Fair	Poor	35750	37.3
June 2015	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	35750	37.3
June 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	32650	37.8
July 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	40480	36.6
July 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	40930	48.8
July 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	41780	48.7
July 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	44730	46.4
July 2003	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	45140	36.0
August 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	48870	66.2
September 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	51870	66.0
February 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	49700	71.0
October 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	47150	80.2
August 1993	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	40760	50.9
December 1991	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	35550	51.6

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	994	994	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	5,161	5,158	3	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	44,707	44,194	513	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	32,271	30,731	1,535	5	0
Superstructure
Steel Truss	linear ft.	284	284	0	0	0
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	398	398	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	35	0	35	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	114	112	2	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	909	891	10	8	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	57	57	0	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	2	2	0	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	2	2	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	1,574	1,574	0	0	0