NFA A174 over CALFKILLER RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.03185, -85.3359836°01'55" N, 85°20'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NFA A174 over CALFKILLER RIVER |
Structure number: | 930A1740001 |
Location: | .02 MI FROM PUTNAM CO IN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Total length: | 167.0 ft. [50.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $988,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 20 | 76.8 |
February 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 20 | 77.8 |
February 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 20 | 78.8 |
February 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Good | 20 | 78.8 |
February 2010 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 20 | 89.8 |
February 2008 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 20 | 89.8 |
March 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 89.8 |
February 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 89.8 |
February 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 93.8 |
March 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 93.8 |
January 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 92.8 |
November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 92.6 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 92.6 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 92.6 |