FAS 136 over SR 136 / SR 111
Map
Coordinates:
+36.05560, -85.5080336°03'20" N, 85°30'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FAS 136 over SR 136 / SR 111 |
Structure number: | 93SR1110011 |
Location: | 2 MI S OF PUTNAM CO LN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 136.2 ft. [41.5 m] |
Total length: | 255.9 ft. [78.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 16° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,470 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2470 | 98.1 |
January 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2490 | 98.1 |
January 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2260 | 98.1 |
January 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2300 | 98.1 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2130 | 98.2 |
January 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 98.2 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1780 | 98.3 |
January 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1880 | 98.3 |
January 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1600 | 99.4 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1740 | 99.3 |
March 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1590 | 99.4 |
November 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1280 | 99.5 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1250 | 99.5 |
October 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1030 | 99.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 256 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 9,216 | 9,216 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 9,216 | 9,216 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 37 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 73 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 38 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 8 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 512 | 471 | 41 | 0 | 0 |