IH 30 EB ML over CO RD
Map
Coordinates:
+33.16402, -95.2740733°09'50" N, 95°16'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | IH 30 EB ML over CO RD |
Structure number: | 010810061002014 |
Location: | 2.3 MI W OF SH 37 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 101.1 ft. [30.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.4 ft. [12.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,010 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 34% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 12010 | 84.3 |
January 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 11780 | 83.2 |
April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 11780 | 95.2 |
May 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 12500 | 95.2 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10380 | 95.3 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11300 | 96.0 |
April 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11090 | 96.0 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10150 | 96.0 |
May 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11205 | 96.0 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8780 | 96.0 |
June 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8120 | 97.0 |
May 1995 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 7870 | 97.0 |
March 1993 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 8470 | 97.0 |
December 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 6590 | 97.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 78 | 70 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 78 | 70 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 200 | 180 | 20 | 0 | 0 |