Share: 
FM 1919 over DRAW
Map
Coordinates:
+33.66752, -99.30027
33°40'03" N, 99°18'01" W
+33.66752, -99.30027
33°40'03" N, 99°18'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FM 1919 over DRAW |
| Structure number: | 030120152301004 |
| Location: | 2.3 MI NW OF FM 2582 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1958 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 220 [as of 2013] |
| Truck traffic: | 26% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.7 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 220 | 89.7 |
| October 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 220 | 89.4 |
| October 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 160 | 89.5 |
| November 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 180 | 76.1 |
| October 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 140 | 76.3 |
| October 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 210 | 76.3 |
| October 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 180 | 76.3 |
| September 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 210 | 76.1 |
| September 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 76.0 |
| July 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 190 | 76.1 |
| August 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 250 | 79.0 |
| August 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 250 | 79.0 |
| August 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 230 | 86.5 |
| October 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 170 | 86.5 |
| October 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 230 | 83.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1522596
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1522596