FM 3296 over Cramers Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+35.77907, -102.9652135°46'45" N, 102°57'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FM 3296 over Cramers Creek |
Structure number: | 041040110802003 |
Location: | 4 Mi W of US 54 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 42% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 87.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 87.4 |
September 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 87.1 |
September 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 87.2 |
September 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 87.2 |
January 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 87.2 |
January 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 90 | 87.4 |
February 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 87.4 |
January 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 80 | 88.4 |
January 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 60 | 92.7 |
November 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 110 | 86.6 |
December 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 110 | 86.6 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 93.7 |
March 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 93.7 |
January 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 70 | 93.7 |
February 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 71.7 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 80.5 |