CR 130 over RICKAWAY BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+29.43324, -96.9324029°25'60" N, 96°55'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 130 over RICKAWAY BRANCH |
Structure number: | 131430AA0561001 |
Location: | 0.70 MI E OF FM 2616 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Total length: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 21.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $5,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Poor | Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 90 | 21.9 |
February 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 40.3 |
February 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 42.2 |
March 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 40.3 |
April 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 42.4 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 90 | 38.5 |
April 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 48.5 |
April 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 48.3 |
August 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 48.3 |
August 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 48.3 |
August 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 46.1 |
August 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 46.1 |
June 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 46.1 |
March 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 48.4 |
January 1990 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Critical | 50 | 16.5 |