CROCKETT ST over SAN ANTONIO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+29.42509, -98.4886629°25'30" N, 98°29'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CROCKETT ST over SAN ANTONIO RIVER |
Structure number: | 150150B08310001 |
Location: | 0.02 MI E OF N PRESA |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Total length: | 86.0 ft. [26.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year reconstructed: | 2017 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,760 [as of 2011] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.9 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $4,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 1760 | 67.9 |
September 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 1760 | 20.0 |
October 2013 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Good | 1760 | 20.0 |
November 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1760 | 62.6 |
October 2009 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1760 | 62.9 |
November 2007 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 1760 | 62.9 |
October 2005 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1760 | 62.9 |
September 2003 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1760 | 62.6 |
January 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1240 | 62.7 |
November 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1240 | 62.7 |
October 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1240 | 80.4 |
May 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1240 | 80.4 |
April 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1240 | 35.5 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 1240 | 42.4 |