US 77 NB over ESCONDIDO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+27.46554, -97.8548127°27'56" N, 97°51'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 77 NB over ESCONDIDO CREEK |
Structure number: | 161370010204068 |
Location: | 0.7 MI S OF FM 1717 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.3 ft. [13.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,770 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8770 | 98.2 |
July 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8770 | 97.2 |
July 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8800 | 95.2 |
August 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8800 | 97.2 |
July 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9450 | 97.1 |
June 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11000 | 97.0 |
May 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 12500 | 96.8 |
March 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9400 | 97.1 |
January 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8450 | 95.2 |
February 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7450 | 95.3 |
January 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7200 | 97.3 |
January 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6300 | 97.5 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6450 | 97.5 |
November 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6500 | 97.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 88 | 78 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 172 | 167 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 400 | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 |