Share:

FM 1409 over LITTLE CANEY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+29.88215, -94.81725
29°52'56" N, 94°49'02" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FM 1409 over LITTLE CANEY CREEK
Structure number:200360076203008
Location:1.5 MI NE OF FM 565
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,630 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:91.3
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$281,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
June 2016Good7 out of 10563091.3
June 2014Good7 out of 10620090.6
June 2012Good7 out of 10620090.6
June 2010Good7 out of 10600089.8
May 2008Good7 out of 10590091.0
July 2006Good7 out of 10620097.0
May 2005Good7 out of 10620095.0
June 2003Good7 out of 10640094.8
October 2001Good7 out of 101000100.0