Share:

SH 285 over CIBOLO CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+27.22533, -98.13142
27°13'31" N, 98°07'53" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SH 285 over CIBOLO CREEK
Structure number:210240010207027
Location:0.60 MI E OF US 281
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1925
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,200 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:89.4

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Fair6 out of 10920089.4
February 2015Fair6 out of 10920089.1
February 2013Fair6 out of 10670089.5
April 2011Fair6 out of 10650088.5
May 2009Fair6 out of 10750089.6
May 2007Fair6 out of 10810090.5
May 2005Fair6 out of 10810089.5
May 2003Fair6 out of 10810091.3
June 2001Good7 out of 10810091.2
July 1999Good7 out of 10650091.5
August 1997Good7 out of 10670091.5
August 1995Good7 out of 10630091.5
March 1993Good7 out of 10650091.4
January 1991Good8 out of 10580099.1