US 281 NB over BUFFALO HOLLOW
Map
Coordinates:
+26.78653, -98.1065726°47'12" N, 98°06'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 281 NB over BUFFALO HOLLOW |
Structure number: | 210240025505027 |
Location: | 7.4 MI S OF FM 755 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.7 ft. [11.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1941 |
Year reconstructed: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,220 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 23% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7220 | 91.0 |
February 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7220 | 90.8 |
February 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 6050 | 90.9 |
April 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5600 | 90.9 |
May 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5550 | 91.2 |
May 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4950 | 89.3 |
May 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4950 | 89.3 |
May 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4950 | 90.0 |
June 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4950 | 90.0 |
July 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4350 | 90.1 |
August 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3350 | 90.2 |
September 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 3150 | 90.2 |
April 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3300 | 82.1 |
January 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2900 | 66.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 84 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 84 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 120 | 118 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |