Share: 
CR 105 over MAIN BRANCH NE CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+26.46224, -97.87918
26°27'44" N, 97°52'45" W
+26.46224, -97.87918
26°27'44" N, 97°52'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 105 over MAIN BRANCH NE CANAL |
| Structure number: | 212450AA0135001 |
| Location: | 1.25 MI S OF SH 186 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 4.9 ft. [1.5 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2010 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2010] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 97.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 97.0 |
| April 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| April 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| April 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| April 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 10 | 100.0 |
| May 2008 | Poor | N out of 10 | 10 | 34.7 |
| June 2006 | Poor | N out of 10 | 10 | 49.1 |
| August 2004 | Poor | N out of 10 | 10 | 49.0 |
| September 2002 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 69.6 |
| December 2000 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 69.6 |
| December 1998 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 69.6 |
| February 1997 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 70.0 |
| December 1994 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 70.5 |
| July 1992 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 74.3 |
| July 1990 | Fair | N out of 10 | 10 | 63.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1564157
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1564157