Share: 
CR 208 over SAN SABA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+31.22306, -98.78495
31°13'23" N, 98°47'06" W
+31.22306, -98.78495
31°13'23" N, 98°47'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 208 over SAN SABA RIVER |
| Structure number: | 232060AA0129001 |
| Location: | 0.70 MI N OF CR 204 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1936 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
| Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2013] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 50.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 50.0 |
| December 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 49.8 |
| December 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 49.8 |
| February 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 49.8 |
| February 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 49.8 |
| February 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 52.0 |
| February 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 52.0 |
| May 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 52.0 |
| May 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 53.6 |
| May 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 53.6 |
| August 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 53.6 |
| January 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 53.6 |
| March 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 51.1 |
| March 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 50.1 |
| April 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 52.9 |
| August 1990 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 41.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1566398
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1566398