300 W. ST. LOGAN over BENSON CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+41.72719, -111.8428341°43'38" N, 111°50'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 300 W. ST. LOGAN over BENSON CANAL |
Structure number: | 005018D |
Location: | 250 SO. 300 W., LOGAN |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 37.4 ft. [11.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 63.7 ft. [19.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 5° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Year reconstructed: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,772 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 82.3 |
May 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 82.3 |
May 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 79.7 |
May 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 79.7 |
May 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 76.7 |
June 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2772 | 76.7 |
August 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 76.8 |
July 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 76.8 |
July 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 76.8 |
August 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 72.8 |
August 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 72.8 |
August 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 72.8 |
July 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 77.8 |
July 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 77.8 |
July 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2000 | 77.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 128 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 36 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,387 | 1,355 | 26 | 6 | 0 |