COUNTY ROAD over CARBON CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+39.55696, -110.8129839°33'25" N, 110°48'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD over CARBON CANAL |
Structure number: | 007009D |
Location: | 2 MILES SOUTH OF PRICE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 126 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 53.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 126 | 53.4 |
June 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 126 | 53.4 |
June 2014 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 126 | 46.4 |
June 2012 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 126 | 46.4 |
June 2010 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 126 | 46.4 |
June 2008 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 126 | 46.4 |
August 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 72.4 |
August 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 72.4 |
August 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 72.4 |
August 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 78.4 |
September 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 78.4 |
August 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 78.4 |
September 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 83.4 |
September 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 83.4 |
August 1990 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 100 | 72.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 49 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 833 | 833 | 0 | 0 | 0 |