COUNTY ROAD over PRICE CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+39.63142, -110.8478139°37'53" N, 110°50'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD over PRICE CANAL |
Structure number: | 007039C |
Location: | IN CARBONVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 139 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 139 | 85.8 |
June 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 139 | 85.8 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 139 | 80.5 |
June 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 139 | 85.1 |
July 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 139 | 85.1 |
June 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 139 | 85.1 |
August 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 110 | 85.4 |
August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 110 | 85.4 |
August 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 85.4 |
August 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 80.3 |
September 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 80.3 |
August 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 80.3 |
September 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 110 | 85.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 123 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 576 | 0 | 576 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |