Share: 
COUNTY ROAD over GSL-SECONDARY CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+41.08929, -112.16297
41°05'21" N, 112°09'47" W
+41.08929, -112.16297
41°05'21" N, 112°09'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY ROAD over GSL-SECONDARY CHANNEL |
| Structure number: | 011020E |
| Location: | GREAT SALT LAKE CAUSEWAY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
| Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1992 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,545 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 58.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2545 | 58.0 |
| March 2016 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2545 | 58.0 |
| March 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2545 | 58.0 |
| March 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2545 | 80.0 |
| March 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2545 | 80.0 |
| February 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2020 | 80.0 |
| June 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2020 | 80.0 |
| April 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2020 | 80.0 |
| June 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2020 | 80.0 |
| March 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2020 | 80.0 |
| February 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 85.7 |
| March 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 85.7 |
| August 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 87.6 |
| August 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 200 | 90.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 100 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1568954
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1568954