COUNTY ROAD over DANISH WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.95769, -109.2651738°57'28" N, 109°15'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD over DANISH WASH |
Structure number: | 019032C |
Location: | 3 MILES SE. OF CISCO |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 13 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 22.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13 | 22.0 |
January 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13 | 22.0 |
January 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13 | 16.0 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13 | 35.2 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 13 | 35.2 |
September 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 35.2 |
March 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 10 | 20.0 |
March 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 10 | 35.2 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 38.2 |
February 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 10 | 38.2 |
August 1996 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 10 | 38.2 |
September 1994 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 10 | 38.2 |
September 1992 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 10 | 38.2 |
May 1990 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 10 | 35.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 93 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Deck | sq. ft. | 361 | 0 | 347 | 14 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 67 | 1 | 0 |