100 NORTH STREET over EAST FORK VIRGIN RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+37.27772, -112.6308137°16'40" N, 112°37'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 100 NORTH STREET over EAST FORK VIRGIN RIVER |
Structure number: | 025010F |
Location: | 200 E. 100 N., ORDERVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 63.7 ft. [19.4 m] |
Total length: | 65.0 ft. [19.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 34° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 126 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 126 | 82.2 |
February 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 126 | 82.2 |
February 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 126 | 88.1 |
February 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 126 | 99.0 |
August 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 126 | 99.0 |
February 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 126 | 99.0 |
February 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 100.0 |
January 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 100.0 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
January 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
February 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 100.0 |
April 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5 | 100.0 |
May 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 455 | 455 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 2,370 | 2,370 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 88 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 130 | 120 | 10 | 0 | 0 |