Share:

SPEC.SERV.DIST.RD. over WEBER RIVER

Morgan County, Utah

Map

Coordinates:
+41.13672, -111.82714
41°08'12" N, 111°49'38" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SPEC.SERV.DIST.RD. over WEBER RIVER
Structure number:	029017C
Location:	SOUTH OF MTN. GREEN INT.
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	61.4 ft. `[18.7 m]`
Total length:	121.1 ft. `[36.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1950
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod `[6]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	13 `[as of 2010]`
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	50.5

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	50.5
May 2016	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	50.5
May 2014	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	58.7
May 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	58.7
May 2010	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	58.7
May 2008	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	13	58.7
September 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	10	58.7
August 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	10	42.6
June 2004	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	10	42.6
July 2002	Poor	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	10	47.6
May 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	69.7
July 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	69.7
July 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	69.7
June 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	69.8
July 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	67.8
June 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	10	67.8

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	490	0	245	245	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	15	15	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	29	29	0	0	0
Joints
Assembly without Seal Joint	linear ft.	13	4	9	0	0
Deck
Timber Deck	sq. ft.	1,625	1,525	50	50	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	8	0	8	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	8	0	8	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	253	253	0	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1569187