300 SOUTH STREET over CITY CREEK FLOOD CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+39.26106, -111.6384239°15'40" N, 111°38'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 300 SOUTH STREET over CITY CREEK FLOOD CHANNEL |
Structure number: | 039002D |
Location: | 90 W. 300 SO., MANTI |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 165.0 ft. [50.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 60° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 126 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 126 | 81.4 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 126 | 81.4 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 126 | 81.4 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 126 | 88.2 |
March 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 126 | 88.2 |
March 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 88.2 |
April 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 88.2 |
April 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 88.2 |
May 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 88.2 |
January 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 88.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 330 | 296 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 37 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 4,166 | 2,466 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |