Share: 
300 EAST STREET over PLEASANT CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.54706, -111.44958
39°32'49" N, 111°26'58" W
+39.54706, -111.44958
39°32'49" N, 111°26'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | 300 EAST STREET over PLEASANT CREEK |
| Structure number: | 039018C |
| Location: | 25 N. 300 E.,MT. PLEASANT |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
| Total length: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 18° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 2000 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 220 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 220 | 99.0 |
| March 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 220 | 99.0 |
| March 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 220 | 99.0 |
| March 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 220 | 99.0 |
| March 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 220 | 99.0 |
| March 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 99.0 |
| April 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 99.0 |
| April 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 99.0 |
| May 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 99.0 |
| March 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 175 | 94.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 300 | 300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,445 | 1,011 | 434 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 77 | 70 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 79 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1569435
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1569435