COUNTY ROAD over SAN PITCH RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+39.52044, -111.5664539°31'14" N, 111°33'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD over SAN PITCH RIVER |
Structure number: | 039027F |
Location: | RACETRK.RD.,5 MI.E.MORONI |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1984 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 75 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 84.0 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 84.0 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 85.0 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 100.0 |
March 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 75 | 100.0 |
March 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 60 | 100.0 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 100.0 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 100.0 |
May 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 100.0 |
March 2000 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 60 | 95.0 |
March 1998 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 60 | 95.0 |
March 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 60 | 95.0 |
August 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 60 | 100.0 |
September 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 60 | 96.0 |
July 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 60 | 96.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 108 | 100 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 540 | 540 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 40 | 23 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 54 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |