RED CLOUD LOOP over SOUTH FORK ASHLEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.73524, -109.7377340°44'07" N, 109°44'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RED CLOUD LOOP over SOUTH FORK ASHLEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 040102000001005 |
Location: | 19.4 MI NW JCT US-191 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Owner: | U.S. Forest Service [64] |
Year built: | 1949 |
Year reconstructed: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 1992] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Unknown [*] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 74.4 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10 | 74.4 |
August 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 10 | 72.4 |
September 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 69.4 |
September 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 69.4 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 66.2 |
August 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.2 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 77.2 |
August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 77.8 |
June 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 80.2 |
July 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 80.2 |
September 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 80.2 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10 | 80.2 |