CO.RD. TO ROWLEY over SKULL VALLEY DRAINAGE C
Map
Coordinates:
+40.75344, -112.7218940°45'12" N, 112°43'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CO.RD. TO ROWLEY over SKULL VALLEY DRAINAGE C |
Structure number: | 045001E |
Location: | 4 MILES W. OF ROWLEY JCT. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Total length: | 57.4 ft. [17.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 46.3 ft. [14.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,021 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1021 | 50.9 |
October 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1021 | 50.9 |
October 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1021 | 75.8 |
October 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1021 | 78.8 |
September 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1021 | 78.8 |
January 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 810 | 80.9 |
September 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 810 | 80.9 |
January 2004 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 810 | 80.9 |
October 2001 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 810 | 80.9 |
October 1999 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 810 | 83.3 |
September 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 800 | 83.4 |
April 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 800 | 83.4 |
April 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 800 | 85.0 |
February 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 790 | 85.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 193 | 41 | 108 | 44 | 0 |