FARR WEST CITY ST. over WILLARD CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+41.29059, -112.0317641°17'26" N, 112°01'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FARR WEST CITY ST. over WILLARD CANAL |
Structure number: | 057002D |
Location: | 2200 W. & 1900 NO. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 91.5 ft. [27.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.8 ft. [9.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 60° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,071 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1071 | 77.4 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1071 | 76.4 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1071 | 75.9 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1071 | 80.8 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1071 | 80.8 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1071 | 80.8 |
June 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 80.9 |
June 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 80.9 |
May 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 80.9 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 75.8 |
April 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 75.8 |
May 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 75.8 |
June 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 850 | 81.4 |
July 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 800 | 81.4 |
September 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 800 | 81.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 200 | 192 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,898 | 2,898 | 0 | 0 | 0 |