SR-95 over COTTONWOOD WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+37.55923, -109.5772837°33'33" N, 109°34'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-95 over COTTONWOOD WASH |
Structure number: | 0C 301 |
Location: | 8.5 MI.SW.OF BLANDING |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 51.5 ft. [15.7 m] |
Total length: | 110.2 ft. [33.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 430 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 55% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 430 | 86.9 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 430 | 86.9 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 404 | 87.1 |
August 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 555 | 84.7 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 555 | 84.7 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 595 | 84.3 |
August 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 595 | 84.3 |
September 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 617 | 84.1 |
August 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 580 | 79.1 |
November 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 465 | 80.3 |
November 1995 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 425 | 86.8 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 390 | 88.1 |
December 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 445 | 85.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 429 | 409 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,652 | 3,602 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 35 | 26 | 7 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 252 | 124 | 128 | 0 | 0 |